Defining
the term 'uncanny' with any real precision is an occupational hazard.
Defining what it isn't –
through a process of elimination – is very much simpler. This has
been considered both on these pages and elsewhere. The latest
attempted definition, here in Editor Marjorie Sandor's choice of gems
old and new, highlights the challenge.
What is 'uncanny' may be whatever the author's narrator leaves out
in terms of explanation. Its very appeal is its lack of objective
conclusion. The uncertain, then, is in the eye of the deceiver. In
the case of this 'deceiver,' I believe the best examples eschew the
usual tropes of eliciting 'horror,' in favour of a percolating sense
in the reader that something undefinable is in the process of going
wrong. It is that coolly sophisticated, indefinable sense – found
in the best examples – that, for me, defines the term.
“(The uncanny) seeks out a recollected or half-neglected physical
place to inhabit: childhood houses, houses under construction, houses
revised by later occupants.”
Really?
Unlike Marjorie Sandor's personal perceptions from childhood (here
referred to in her introduction) for me it avoids
the literal walls of the Gothic edifice. Instead, it hides in the
mind – of both author and reader; its clammy darkness emanating
from somewhere more psychologically
internal. Sandor ensures kicking off with the safest bet by another
reprint for Hoffmann's 'Sand-man.' What follows it is a chequerboard
of those that justify inclusion - and those that do not.
Those that succeed in this curious genre include Maupassant's
meditation on subjective isolation 'On the Water,' Marjorie Bowen's
'Decay,' Aickman's 'Waiting Room,' Shirley Jackson's 'Paranoia,' Kate
Bernheimer's 'Whitework' and – ironically – Mansoura Ez Eldin's
'Gothic Night' (again, used in the psychological sense), all using
its more subtle, metaphysical language.
I welcomed the chance to belatedly catch-up on a couple of authors
long known about but never read - Jonathan Carroll ('The Panic
Hand,'), Shirley Jackson and China Mieville ('Foundation') –
alongside new discoveries such as Chris Adrian ('The Black Square'),
Kate Bernheimer and Yoko Ogawa ('Old Mrs J.'). Then, I am a
writer-reader; it's by no means clear how this anthology might appeal
to an audience less committed.
Certain
entries here flirt too closely to horror to be true arbiters. Where
climactic explanation may be rightfully vague, the Grand
Guignol depiction en route is
overt in earlier classics. e.g. Lovecraft's 'Music of Eric Zann,'
Chekov's 'Oysters' and Bruno Schulz's 'The Birds' step beyond the
mere uncanny into horror's more visceral description. Their
individual excellence isn't compromised placed in this context.
Neither does putting this anthology's title
to one side alter the fact of this being a collection of superb
tales; just not a superb collection
of uncanny tales.
No comments:
Post a Comment